Quentin Richardson has been traded four times this offseason, with the latest deal landing him with the Heat.Richardson is expected remain in Miami after being dealt from New York, Memphis, Los Angeles and Minnesota in the last two months.He is excited to play alongside Dwyane Wade, as both came out of Chicago."We would always talk about it," Richardson said, according to the Miami Herald. "It's exciting to be playing together for the first time in our careers."Richardson, a nine-year veteran that has played for three teams, didn't foresee being involved in so many trades this summer."You couldn't have predicted at the beginning of the summer I would be traded this many times," said Richardson. "That's just how the chips fall."

Question is: should we keep him (i prefer) or should we use him in a trade for Boozer b4 the deadline? 'Cuz im pretty sure Haslem and Wright wont be enough trade bait for the J a z z.

UTAH WANTS HASLEM AND POSSIBLY BEASLEY

Qs and UDs salaries would be pretty much the same as Boozers, and they want capspace, that why they are trading Booz.

So I dont think Q will be traded.

I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

ive said this many times on other boards... lets not trade for boozer and go in with what we got. Look the j*** have a decent team with a nice combo or deron and boozer and still no finals appearance with the team. Why add boozer when we have beasley? Beasley is just like another boozer but more athletic, and with more range on his shot. I say keep richardson as is don't make any more moves this is perfect. NO tinsley, no iverson lets just go into the season how we are now. Who ever else we add wont change the outcome of our season we will have a great season but lets just be patient for next offseason to add the likes of either bosh or amare and we'll see...

quote:

Originally posted by Björn Gustafsson:
I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

Beverley is going to be something in this league... you can go ahead and hate all you want with what I'm about to say but he will make chalmers sweat for that starting spot... and beverley will probably be our starter one day and have a better career than chalmers. I'm not hating on chalms I love the guy, it's just that this guy beverley is no joke and he will catch many people by surprise... he will be known as one of the biggest steals in this draft

quote:

Originally posted by RollaCosta33:

quote:

Originally posted by Björn Gustafsson:
I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

Beverley is going to be something in this league... you can go ahead and hate all you want with what I'm about to say but he will make chalmers sweat for that starting spot... and beverley will probably be our starter one day and have a better career than chalmers. I'm not hating on chalms I love the guy, it's just that this guy beverley is no joke and he will catch many people by surprise... he will be known as one of the biggest steals in this draft

dont assume anything until he plays a game in the nba right now chalmers is a better player

quote:

Originally posted by Björn Gustafsson:
Qs and UDs salaries would be pretty much the same as Boozers, and they want capspace, that why they are trading Booz.

So I dont think Q will be traded.

I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

way too much for a guy that will be free in 2010.He is good,but cook and 2 picks?.If toronto miss the PO we would not have a 1st pick for us since you traded him to the j***.Send haslem and jones and a 2nd round and if they dont want that deal,then let them pay the price of holding a player they dont need

quote:

Originally posted by UNCLE SPOEY IS REAL COY:
UTAH WANTS HASLEM AND POSSIBLY BEASLEY

In that case **** Utah.

quote:

Originally posted by WadeIsBetterThanLebron:

quote:

Originally posted by Björn Gustafsson:
Qs and UDs salaries would be pretty much the same as Boozers, and they want capspace, that why they are trading Booz.

So I dont think Q will be traded.

I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

way too much for a guy that will be free in 2010.He is good,but cook and 2 picks?.If toronto miss the PO we would not have a 1st pick for us since you traded him to the j***.Send haslem and jones and a 2nd round and if they dont want that deal,then let them pay the price of holding a player they dont need

I wouldnt mind giving up Cook + Jones + 1 first round + 1 seconf round. But thats me.

We would still have a first round, and maybe a second round too. We have a bunch of picks next draft.

By saying - UD and Jones and a second round pick - is better then my trade, you are saying that - Cook and a late first round pick - is better then Haslem, I dont think so, but you maybe do?

Boozer will be free in 2010, but you cant get his bird rigths then, and those are the thing thats valuble.

Keep Q-Rich lets make a trade like this:

Haslem,Jones,+picks for Boozer.

Or Wright, haslem and cook and boozer and picks.

Of course he wants to stay. Being traded all over the place must be embarrassing. He probably feels like a $1 hooker. Everyone has had her (this off-season). lol.

I say Miami should trade him just for the LOL.

Wonder if it's possible to have him traded to EVERY single team in the NBA this off-season. That would be beyond epic.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by RollaCosta33:
Why add boozer when we have beasley? Beasley is just like another boozer but more athletic, and with more range on his shot.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, dude what are you smoking? Beasley just like boozer? Beasley is no one near boozer man. Be real about things on here, quit putting beasley up on a high pedestal until he does something to deserve it.

quote:

Originally posted by RollaCosta33:

quote:

Originally posted by Björn Gustafsson:
I hope it will be like Cook + Jones + 1 round pick + 2nd round. Or somthing like that, maybe throw in Beverley if we get a vet PG. But it will be like UD + Jones/Cook and a 1 round pick.

Beverley is going to be something in this league... you can go ahead and hate all you want with what I'm about to say but he will make chalmers sweat for that starting spot... and beverley will probably be our starter one day and have a better career than chalmers. I'm not hating on chalms I love the guy, it's just that this guy beverley is no joke and he will catch many people by surprise... he will be known as one of the biggest steals in this draft

Sounds alot like your hating seeing how Miami won't even take Iverson seeing how He wants to start .... So you fail...

Oh ya, and were most likley not even going to sign Beverley even though hes getting alot of Heat Publicity.

We just dont need another rookie point guard, We need a veteran presence at the point to back up Chalmers....aka Jamaal Tinsley

quote:

Originally posted by Jermaine7Oneal87:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by RollaCosta33:
Why add boozer when we have beasley? Beasley is just like another boozer but more athletic, and with more range on his shot.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, dude what are you smoking? Beasley just like boozer? Beasley is no one near boozer man. Be real about things on here, quit putting beasley up on a high pedestal until he does something to deserve it.

ok buddy outside of the nba how much basketball do you watch?... and it was my fault i meant to say on a potential standpoint beasley will be better than booz... just wait and see i'm not big on assuming players will be STARS but beasley is a star just wait you will enjoy with what u will see from beasley this year... people need to understand that alot of people compare boozer and beasley just because of their size at the position they play... well you know what if someone KNEW basketball and WATCHES basketball u can say that beasley arguably had a better rookie season than boozer given that boozer was mostly a starter his rookie season if i remember correctly during his rookie year... and beasley came off the bench and played less minutes... hmmm lets see maybe u should tell me the outcome

I would keep him.